Brazilian consumers are up in arms against what they perceive as price gouging by fuel ethanol distributors and retailers: since the end of January 09, prices paid to producers in Brazil's Center-South region have fallen by 13%, from USD .3831 to USD .3329 per liter (USD 1.448 to USD 1.258 per gallon) (
source: Cepea). But these savings have yet to be passed on to consumers.
The drop is happening right in the middle of the sugarcane off-season, when prices have historically been at their peak. With little storage capacity to secure a more even flow of ethanol throughout the year, supply is strongly conditioned by the availability of sugarcane for processing. This fact usually causes prices to bottom out at the height of the harvest season, which lasts roughly from April to October in Sao Paulo state, the country's main sugar- and ethanol-producing region.
This year's season has yet to begin, but prices paid to producers are at levels last seen in June 08, when the sugarcane harvest was in full swing.
Folha de S. Paulo, Brazil's leading daily,
reports that,
"At some fueling stations in Sao Paulo state, the difference between ethanol prices at the pump and prices paid to producers at factory gates reached 105% the week of March 16. On average, the difference was 79%."
This apparent mismatch may be laid down to a high degree of operating leverage in the fuel distribution chain, much of which results from the gross inefficiencies that mark the industry. Further, many companies are buying out of the hype that promised to make Brazil an energy powerhouse one day and focusing instead on the shorter term. The net result is that producers are expected to favor sugar over ethanol; in fact, many are now dumping ethanol inventories to raise cash in preparation for increased sugar output.
Ethanol prices may be collapsing, but the outlook for sugar looks increasingly bullish. India, the world's second-largest producer, is expected to see a shortfall in production of some 4 million tonnes. The European Union, induced by government policy reforms, is also expected to produce less. These and other changes are projected to lead to a global deficit of between
5 million and
10 million tonnes of sugar this year.
Brazil, which in the 2007-2008 season harvested a record 493 million tonnes of sugarcane, up 16% from the previous season, produced 30.7 million tonnes of sugar and 22.5 billion liters of ethanol over the same period (
source: Unica. Note: figures for the 2008-2009 season have yet to be tallied). The country's capacity to sway markets for both commodities is illustrated by the recent performance of Cosan, Brazil's largest sugar and ethanol concern. In the in 2008-2009 season,
it processed 44.2 million tonnes of sugarcane, more than the entire output of Australia during the same period: a comparatively piddling 36 million tonnes.
An estimated
USD 20 billion, from Brazilian and foreign sources, has been invested in capacity expansion over the past four years. As a result, agricultural output has ballooned, with another surge in sugarcane production expected this year.
While more producers will almost certainly prefer sugar over ethanol, the precise mix will be determined by market forces shaping up amid the global economic meltdown. On the supply side, the ability of companies to secure access to credit lines (a very iffy proposition right now) will be of fundamental importance. From a demand perspective, the speed at which developed countries with ethanol blending requirements rebound from the current crisis (if at all) will be just as decisive.
Of course, speculators also have a role to play. Reuters
reports that, in May 2008,
Peter Baron, executive director of the International Sugar Organization, predicted that:
"The tremendous flow of capital from financial institutions into commodity futures to seek diversification away from the sectors affected by the credit crunch has clearly pressured fundamentals. It is clear that the net inflow of funds in sugar futures is a decisive driver for today's world prices."
That theory, of course, went out the window with the collapse in commodity prices in Q3 2008. It may become valid again if financial players rush back into commodities, as Marc Faber, Jim Rogers, and many others have been prognosticating (incidentally, Jim Rogers' old partner in the Quantum Fund, George Soros, is one of the investors in Adecoagro, which has plans for a combined four plants in Brazil - one in Minas Gerais state and three in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, in the country's Center-West).
While switching to sugar may be a way out for many producers in Brazil, a sizable share of the new projects that have come on-stream can produce only ethanol. These companies are taking a severe beating, as the players that produce both commodities continue to dump ethanol inventories to raise cash. (
According to the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, the country has 420 plants: 248 produce both sugar and ethanol, fifteen produce only sugar, and 157 produce only ethanol).
In short, rising sugar prices, tight credit, and massive overcapacity do not bode well for ethanol prices. Many producers, including the much-feted Santelisa Vale, are now being forced to look for partners with greater financial heft - or fold.
-Henrique Oliveira